So how did the Party born in 1854 to go on later to abolish slavery (handing the Democrat party their asses in the process) after the election of the 1st Republican President of the United States in Abraham Lincoln (and his struggle to mend back together a divided Nation torn apart by a slavery supporting Democrat Party until his assassination by John Wilkes Booth in 1865), come to be the whipping boy of said Party of slavery today??
And even more horrific being: Why are so many of those today (whose ancestors so many fought and died throughout the Civil War to secure the freedoms of), so willfully enslaved again to the Party who tore apart a Nation 152 years ago trying to keep them in perpetual bondage??? These are rhetorical questions that I think most of us already know the answers to however, but still…
…How did we go from this….
…To this??
“If you have a small business, you didn’t build that!”
Obama and his toadies like to compare him to Lincoln, but I’d like to know where any resemblance between the 2 exists, because I sure as Hell don’t see any!
From this…
To this…
What was that, Bill?
Yeah, I know. Go figure, huh?
How have we fallen though, from this…
To this?
In the last 50 or so years, our Country has experienced an unprecedented decline. A gross defacing and deliberate vandalism of our National landscape and cultural identity! This has been done by design and promoted by a secular group we refer to today as “Progressives”! These individuals have, over recent decades, managed to successfully infiltrate (and have usurped in totality today) that which we all refer to as the Democrat Party in Washington D.C.! A political hierarchy from its leaders down through out the ranks of their followers which, ironically enough, when represented and viewed as whole, have characteristics and certain behavioral traits more typically identified with radical Islam and those extremists who promote and advance its message, than they do with average Americans!
Consequentially, these Progressives have thrust upon us their Sharia law of….
And have thus paved the way ultimately for this….
As a result, we’ve had 4 years so far of ‘THIS’ crap (and this is only ‘some’ of the crap too!)…
And now, 4 years later and with the 2012 elections behind us (and the sobering reality of another 4 years of this subversive ruse “overwhelming the system” staring us in the face), here’s just some of what we’ve already begun to see (most of it started before he was even sworn in for his 2nd term!)..
And so it goes. My thoughts on the subject of gun-control are unambiguous and not complicated at all….
And my opinion of those who willfully choose to ignore the reality around them is simple too…
Here’s some closing commentaries from our “man on the street”….
The D.C. Clothesline 
What a joke. There is no way Lincoln would be a republican today..he was for a strong federal government. You are confusing ideology with political parties.
Yeah, you’re an authority on what the political affiliation of a man who died 149 years ago would be today. You have no credibility just in that statement alone!
Actually, he is generally correct about big government. Although somewhat of a statesman, Lincoln was NOT all that the liberal historians make him out to be simply because of the slavery issue that they love to twist to meet their needs. He had little respect for State’s rights.
Might want to check your history on Lincoln and slavery.
The Emancipation proclamation that most claim stopped slavery actually mainly had to do with slavery in the western territories and any new states that might be formed.
The main purpose behind it was to encourage the slaves to revolt and kill the woman and children left on the farms in the South since the men were off fighting. That didn’t happen, many stayed where they were.
Most blacks in the union army were treated worse than slaves and were forced to do the worst jobs. Many found they were treated worse that they had been before they were “freed”.
At the beginning of the War of Northern Aggression, there was actually an Amendment to the Constitution that passed that stated that slavery could not be prohibited. It was the Corwin amendment. It was ratified by three states, all northern, to include Lincoln’s home state of Illinois.
There is much more but I won’t go on except to say we need to remember and teach our REAL history as it truly was, not how the liberals want us to know it.
Slavery was a very minor part of the reason for the war. Mainly, the rich north wanted the poor south for their tax and tariff income of which most went to the north because they had the higher portion of representation and therefore could direct where the funds went. Lincoln had to “force” the states back into the union to keep from losing all that revenue.
That’s all fascinating, but you might want to check the title of this Blog. I merely mentioned Lincoln as trying to hold together a Nation divided & referencing how the republican party has fallen in stature since its beginnings. However, I will provide an excerpt here (since I don’t have the time myself to argue in writing about your grossly egregious attempt at revising history) to refute your claim that you assert concerning slavery playing a minor role in the Civil War. You ought to be ashamed of yourself tho’! :
~”Over the past sixty years, many groups, exploiting a general lack of public knowledge about particular movements or events, have urged upon the public various revisionist views in order to justify their particular agenda. For example, those who use activist courts to advance policies they are unable to pass through the normal legislative process defend judicial abuse by asserting three historically unfounded doctrines: (1) the judiciary is to protect the minority from the majority; (2) the judiciary exists to review and correct the acts of elective bodies; and (3) the judiciary is best equipped to “evolve” the culture to the needs of an ever-changing society. These claims are directly refuted by original constitutional writings, especially The Federalist Papers. (See also the WallBuilders’ book, Restraining Judicial Activism.)
Likewise, those who pursue a secular public square seek to justify their agenda by asserting that the Founding Fathers: (1) were atheists, agnostics, and deists, and (2) wrote into the Constitution a strict separation of church and state requiring the exclusion of religious expressions from the public arena. These claims are also easily rebuttable through the Founders’ own writings and public acts. (See also the WallBuilders’ book, Original Intent.)
A third example of historical revisionism involves the claim that the 1860-1861 secession of the Southern States which caused the Civil War was not a result of the slavery issue but rather of oppressive federal economic policies. For example, a plaque in the Texas State Capitol declares:
Because we desire to perpetuate, in love and honor, the heroic deeds of those who enlisted in the Confederate Army and upheld its flag through four years of war, we, the children of the South, have united together in an organization called “Children of the Confederacy,” in which our strength, enthusiasm, and love of justice can exert its influence. We therefore pledge ourselves to preserve pure ideals; to honor our veterans; to study and teach the truths of history (one of the most important of which is that the war between the states was not a rebellion nor was its underlying cause to sustain slavery), and to always act in a manner that will reflect honor upon our noble and patriotic ancestors. (emphasis added)
Other sources make the same false claim, 2 but four notable categories of Confederate records disprove these claims and indisputably show that the South’s desire to preserve slavery was indisputably the driving reason for the formation of the Confederacy!”
What a great ad,…love the way you lined it all out with Facts!,…I agree 100%
Obama is always the most inexperienced person in the room,….but he is black and a Socialst so the Media loves him and is why he can get away with anything
Reblogged this on Jesse Talks Back and commented:
Beautiful
Chad, hope I didn’t upset you with my Lincoln post since I don’t see it made it to being posted. That was not the intent. I just like to correct history where I can since it has been so twisted by the progressives.
Seriously, we have an enemy at the door step. They have laid out their plans to us. They are poisoning our water, our skies, our food. They have destroyed our economy by shipping all of our manufacturing and production jobs over seas via NAFTA. Most of our fruits and vegetables come from South America because of CAFTA. They murdered 3,000 people on 911. They are responsible for thousands of US soldiers death & permanent injuries because of the lies of 911. Now, they want our guns…
I love this piece for somewhat selfish reasons. Do you have any idea how hard it is to gather this many great pictures. I can go a month with these on Facebook. 🙂 Nice job Chad. If a picture paints a thousand words then you certainly said a mouthful. I love the idea. I wish I could come up with stuff like this. I’m a little jealous.
I thought doing this would be a cinch, Dean, with the majority of the content being mostly pictures, but this took a surprising amount of time to put together actually. And I’m still not pleased with it, but it’s not too bad I guess for being my first stab at doing a Blog mostly in pictures. lol
Lincoln was corrupt too. He had his associates promise jobs to outgoing House of Representatives if they voted to abolish slavery. Check your facts….
This isn’t about Lincoln! He’s just referenced here. Go be a historian where someone might actually care about your distortionist take on history.