So if liberalism supports ‘Darwinism’ & its whole ‘THEORY’ of evolution, shouldn’t the large segment of a ‘non-working’ population who rely & are ‘dependent’ upon the ‘working’ segment of the population to support & provide for them, fall under the category in Darwin’s ‘THEORY’ having to do with ‘survival of the fittest’?? If we were to go by that reasoning then, how do liberals reconcile that ‘THEORY’ with themselves, when so many apparently either aren’t fit or have no desire to survive on their own & take care of themselves?!? ~Chad Miller~
Error: Twitter did not respond. Please wait a few minutes and refresh this page.
Top Posts & Pages
- If They Come for Your Guns, Do You Have a Responsibility to Fight?
- Do Republicans and Democrats Agree on Anything?
- My Conversation with our Founding Fathers.
- Obama: America's First Gay President Keeps Sodomizing America Every Chance He Gets!
- FEMA Camps and the Threat of Martial Law Didn't Start With Obama...
- 4208 February 21, 2013
- Notice to Our Readers…The D.C. Clothesline is Moving February 19, 2013
- STATE LEGISLATURES, SUPREME COURTS, GOVERNORS’ OFFICES, AND OFFICIAL WEB PAGES LINKS February 17, 2013
- Ft. Hood Massacre Survivors Betrayed By Obama Too In His Litany Of Treacheries That Just Goes On & On February 16, 2013
- Is Fred Phelps a Common Bigot? Or an Evil Genius? February 16, 2013
- Random Thoughts and Ramblings February 15, 2013
- Russian Author States “…the US 2nd Amendment is a rare light in an ever darkening room.” February 15, 2013
- 4065 February 15, 2013
- 4064 February 15, 2013
- 4063 February 15, 2013
- YOUR COMMUNIST MANIFESTO February 14, 2013
- Truth, justice & the American way? Not in Obama’s America as his Gay Gestapo wages war on Superman & target your kids! February 13, 2013